Go Back   Hip Hop Board > Hip Hop > Hip Hop News
Connect with Facebook

Hip Hop News Get all the latest Hip Hop news here. This section is generated by users of the community that post articles found on other hip hop related websites.
RSS

The owner of HHboard is DiGiJeff you can PM him here
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2008, 02:27 PM   #1
"Culture Gone Bad"
 
KeepitthorO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 779
Repped: 23
Repped 785 Times in 192 Posts
Neg Reps: 0
Neg Repped at 1 Time in 1 Post
KeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him assholeKeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him assholeKeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him assholeKeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him assholeKeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him assholeKeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him assholeKeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him assholeKeepitthorO very powerful and known so dont fuck with him asshole
Default 05/16/08 - R. Kelly Trial Jury Complete, Defense Charges Prosecution Of Racial Bias

05/16/08 - R. Kelly Trial Jury Complete, Defense Charges Prosecution Of Racial Bias

Jury ********** concluded yesterday for the long-awaited child pornography trial of superstar R. Kelly but tension between both sides were sparked as the defense accused the prosecution of racial bias.

According to the Associated Press, of the 12 jurors who will open the case, eight are white and four are black. With the four alternate jurors comprised of two blacks, one Hispanic and one white. Before the panel was finalized, R. Kelly's attorney's accused prosecutors of deliberately removing black jurors. Objecting several times, the defense charged the prosecution used challenges to have several blacks dismissed from the jury pool.

"I think they're using these (challenges) to get rid of African-Americans," said Sam Adam, Sr., one of Kelly's lawyers.

According to the Chicago Sun-Times, the aforementioned challenges was displayed when the prosecution dismissed a black man -who's hair was in cornrows like Kelly's- because of his criminal record. The man was rejected for concealing his criminal record when filling out his questionnaire, and was dismissed by the judge for being dishonest.

When the motion was contested by Adam, Judge Vincent Gaughan fired the defense didn't argue when white males were dismissed.

"You haven't said anything about all the white males you've dismissed," Gaughan said.

In response, Adam protested the prosecution "used 50 percent of their challenges on African-Americans."

Prosecutor Shauna Boliker shot back, telling the judge that the defense had used all six of their preemptory challenges - strikes that usually require no explanation - on removing whites from the jury.

As SOHH previously reported, five jurors were picked for the panel on Tuesday (May 13). Consisting of five men and three women, the jurors were an even split of both black and white. Three jurors were selected prior to the five, two African-American (a man and woman) and a white man.

Among the six jurors chosen Thursday, a young woman told Judge Gaughan that she was a victim of rape and she could put the traumatic experience aside and hear the case fairly. Despite objections from defense attorney Ed Genson, Gaughan denied the defense request, saying the victim had looked Kelly in the eye and promised him a fair trial. She was added to the panel.

One juror, who was later named an alternate, told the judge that pictures don't always reveal the whole truth of the situation. As the young man spoke, Kelly looked up and nodded his head in agreement.

A 68 year-old man who immigrated from Communist Romania 38 years ago, praised the U.S. justice system, saying he understood the accused are presumed innocent, stating "the score sheet at the beginning of the trial- zero, zero."

Of the final two women selected as alternates one was a retired Cook County sheriff's deputy, who worked in the same complex that the trial is being held, said she knew little about the case and could be fair.

The 41 year-old R&B singer was indicted on child pornography charges in June 2002 for allegedly videotaping himself having sex with an underage girl. The girl in question, now 23, says it's not her on the tape. Kelly has pleaded not- guilty. If convicted, Kells could face up to 15 years in prison.

source: sohh
__________________
KeepitthorO is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Repped to KeepitthorO For This Useful Post:
J.O1178 (05-18-2008)
Old 05-18-2008, 03:36 PM   #2
Veteran
 
jg213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,250
Repped: 238
Repped 159 Times in 61 Posts
Neg Reps: 1
Neg Repped at 83 Times in 50 Posts
jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213 jg213
Default

kelly guilty as fuck but he gonna get off...... just like those other child porn sex tapes off himself & young girls his lawers got dismissed a year or 2 ago because they were seized in the wrong way.... e.g. they were searching his house for drugs when they found the videos of him fucking some other underage girls. His lawyers got all those shits dismissed on technicallies. e.g they never had warrant to enable them to take those videos, so they couldnt be used.

His lawyers are being paid millions they gonna do any trick. that girl aint gon testify to shit because she probably wouldnt wanna fuck up her idol, or she been paid off or she has been warned.

R Kellys brother even said r kelly did it and that he offered to pay him for him to say it was him in the video.........

I dont believe this guy has been out for over 5 years
jg213 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Hip Hop Board > Hip Hop > Hip Hop News
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0